Coquitlam U22F Team 2
- Rating
- 95.43
- Record
- 3-9-3
- GF-GA
- 55-70
| Date | Opponent | W/L/T | Score | GD | Opp. Rating | Points | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9 | Ridge Meadows U22F Team 2 | L | 2-5 | -3 | 99.99 | 96.99 | 1.56 |
| Apr 16 | Port Coquitlam U22F | L | 1-3 | -2 | 97.90 | 95.90 | 0.47 |
| Apr 22 | Port Coquitlam U22F | L | 4-7 | -3 | 97.90 | 94.90 | -0.53 |
| Apr 23 | Burnaby U22F | W | 4-1 | 3 | 91.43 | 94.43 | -1.00 |
| Apr 30 | Port Coquitlam U22F | T | 7-7 | 0 | 97.90 | 97.90 | 2.47 |
| May 7 | New Westminster U22F | W | 7-4 | 3 | 95.02 | 98.02 | 2.59 |
| May 8 | New Westminster U22F | L | 5-7 | -2 | 95.02 | 93.02 | -2.41 |
| May 11 | Burnaby U22F | T | 3-3 | 0 | 91.43 | 91.43 | -4.00 |
| May 16 | Port Coquitlam U22F | L | 3-5 | -2 | 97.90 | 95.90 | 0.47 |
| May 16 | Victoria-Esquimalt U22F | L | 1-4 | -3 | 95.95 | 92.95 | -2.48 |
| May 17 | Ridge Meadows U22F Team 1 | L | 2-3 | -1 | 96.67 | 95.67 | 0.24 |
| May 17 | New Westminster U22F | W | 7-6 | 1 | 95.02 | 96.02 | 0.59 |
| May 21 | Coquitlam U22F Team 1 | T | 4-4 | 0 | 98.79 | 98.79 | 3.36 |
| May 23 | Ridge Meadows U22F Team 1 | L | 2-4 | -2 | 96.67 | 94.67 | -0.76 |
| May 26 | Coquitlam U22F Team 1 | L | 3-7 | -4 | 98.79 | 94.79 | -0.64 |
| Totals (15 games) | 3-9-3 | 55-70 | -15 | 1446.44 | 1431.44 | -0.07 | |
| Averages | -1.00 | 96.42 | 95.42 | 0.00 | |||
Note: The maximum goal differential for any one game is 10 The average goal differential (GD) should equal this team's AGD from the rankings page. The average "Opp Rating" should equal this team's SCHED. The average "Points" is the team's rating. The average "+/-" should equal 0.00, but it is possible that rounding errors of 0.01 will occur occasionally. Larger error numbers indicate that a game scores has been changed or deleted since the last ratings calculation. The points and +/- columns give you an indication as to whether the team did better or worse than expected based upon ratings. Positive +/- numbers mean the team did better than expected and "helped" its rating. Games with negative numbers mean the team performed worse than expected.