Ridge Meadows U15F A
- Rating
- 98.98
- Record
- 10-4-4
- GF-GA
- 91-49
| Date | Opponent | W/L/T | Score | GD | Opp. Rating | Points | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10 | Coquitlam U15F A | W | 8-4 | 4 | 95.87 | 99.87 | 0.89 |
| Apr 17 | New West/Burnaby U15F A | L | 0-6 | -6 | 99.99 | 93.99 | -4.99 |
| Apr 19 | New West/Burnaby U15F A | L | 2-3 | -1 | 99.99 | 98.99 | 0.01 |
| Apr 23 | Port Moody/Port Coquitlam U15F A | L | 4-6 | -2 | 97.86 | 95.86 | -3.12 |
| Apr 24 | Langley U15F A | W | 3-0 | 3 | 96.39 | 99.39 | 0.41 |
| Apr 26 | Langley U15F A | W | 7-4 | 3 | 96.39 | 99.39 | 0.41 |
| Apr 29 | Langley U15F A | T | 2-2 | 0 | 96.39 | 96.39 | -2.59 |
| May 2 | New West/Burnaby U15F A | L | 1-2 | -1 | 99.99 | 98.99 | 0.01 |
| May 3 | Nanaimo U15F A | W | 10-2 | 8 | 91.63 | 99.63 | 0.65 |
| May 3 | Port Moody/Port Coquitlam U15F A | W | 7-1 | 6 | 97.86 | 103.86 | 4.88 |
| May 4 | New West/Burnaby U15F A | W | 4-2 | 2 | 99.99 | 101.99 | 3.01 |
| May 6 | Coquitlam U15F A | T | 4-4 | 0 | 95.87 | 95.87 | -3.11 |
| May 7 | Mission U15F B | W | 8-1 | 7 | 92.50 | 99.50 | 0.52 |
| May 12 | Mission U15F B | W | 8-0 | 8 | 92.50 | 100.50 | 1.52 |
| May 15 | Coquitlam U15F A | W | 7-0 | 7 | 95.87 | 102.87 | 3.89 |
| May 17 | Langley U15F A | W | 7-3 | 4 | 96.39 | 100.39 | 1.41 |
| May 18 | Port Moody/Port Coquitlam U15F A | T | 5-5 | 0 | 97.86 | 97.86 | -1.12 |
| May 22 | Langley U15F A | T | 4-4 | 0 | 96.39 | 96.39 | -2.59 |
| Totals (18 games) | 10-4-4 | 91-49 | 42 | 1739.77 | 1781.77 | 0.09 | |
| Averages | 2.33 | 96.65 | 98.98 | 0.00 | |||
Note: The maximum goal differential for any one game is 10 The average goal differential (GD) should equal this team's AGD from the rankings page. The average "Opp Rating" should equal this team's SCHED. The average "Points" is the team's rating. The average "+/-" should equal 0.00, but it is possible that rounding errors of 0.01 will occur occasionally. Larger error numbers indicate that a game scores has been changed or deleted since the last ratings calculation. The points and +/- columns give you an indication as to whether the team did better or worse than expected based upon ratings. Positive +/- numbers mean the team did better than expected and "helped" its rating. Games with negative numbers mean the team performed worse than expected.